Screener
DRN vs FAZ
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- DRN costs 0.05% less per year.
- DRN follows a leveraged strategy; FAZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, DRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRN | FAZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $120M |
| Since | 2009 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 3.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.1% | -9.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | -38.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.4% | -27.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | -0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 39.97% | 43.24% |
| Max drawdown | -86.32% | -99.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRN and FAZ
Explore further