Screener
DRSK vs BTR
Aptus Defined Risk ETF vs Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
Key differences
- DRSK costs 0.30% less per year.
- DRSK is significantly larger than BTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DRSK is classified as alternative, while BTR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- DRSK follows a option income strategy; BTR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DRSK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DRSK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRSK | BTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 1.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $37M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.72% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.0% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.23% | 9.77% |
| Max drawdown | -19.87% | -16.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRSK and BTR
Explore further