Skip to content
Screener

DSCO vs LMBS

DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF

DSCO

DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$195M

LMBS

First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF

Annual cost

0.66%

Fund size

$6.3B

Key differences

Both DSCO and LMBS are fixed income ETFs. DSCO charges 0.50% a year and LMBS 0.66%. The main difference: DSCO follows a active selection strategy; LMBS uses index tracking.

  • DSCO follows a active selection strategy; LMBS uses index tracking.
  • DSCO costs 0.16% less per year.
  • LMBS is much larger than DSCO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

DSCOLMBS
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.66%
Fund size (AUM)$195M$6.3B
Since20192014
Dividend yield5.54%4.10%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+5.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+5.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+3.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.83
Volatility 1Y1.94%
Max drawdown-1.62%-6.48%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to DSCO and LMBS