Screener
DUSB vs GBND
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF vs Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- DUSB costs 0.10% less per year.
- DUSB is significantly larger than GBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| DUSB | GBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $480M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.16% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.43% | — |
| Max drawdown | -0.29% | -2.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DUSB and GBND
Explore further