Screener
DUSB vs GSIG
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
Key differences
- GSIG costs 0.07% less per year.
- DUSB is significantly larger than GSIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DUSB follows a active selection strategy; GSIG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| DUSB | GSIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $9M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.16% | 4.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.43% | 1.86% |
| Max drawdown | -0.29% | -9.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DUSB and GSIG
Explore further