Screener
DUTY vs ZTEN
U.S. Defense ETF vs F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- ZTEN costs 0.30% less per year.
- ZTEN is significantly larger than DUTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DUTY is classified as equity, while ZTEN is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- DUTY covers north america markets; ZTEN covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| DUTY | ZTEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.7M | $30M |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.56% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 5.06% |
| Max drawdown | -6.42% | -5.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DUTY and ZTEN
Explore further