Screener
DWSH vs FVC
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF vs First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF
Key differences
- FVC costs 5.35% less per year.
- FVC is significantly larger than DWSH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DWSH is classified as alternative, while FVC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- DWSH follows a long short strategy; FVC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FVC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DWSH | FVC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 6.22% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $104M |
| Since | 2018 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.38% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -13.1% | +20.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -5.3% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.0% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.28 | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.02% | 12.82% |
| Max drawdown | -82.73% | -30.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DWSH and FVC
Explore further