Screener
DWX vs EFAS
State Street SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- DWX costs 0.10% less per year.
- DWX is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DWX is classified as alternative, while EFAS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DWX | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $512M | $48M |
| Since | 2008 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.9% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.9% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.88% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -36.05% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DWX and EFAS
Explore further