Screener
DYNB vs HCRB
Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF vs Hartford Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- HCRB costs 0.31% less per year.
- HCRB is significantly larger than DYNB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DYNB follows a active selection strategy; HCRB uses index tracking.
- HCRB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DYNB | HCRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $360M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.18% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.85% |
| Max drawdown | -2.61% | -19.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DYNB and HCRB
Explore further