Skip to content
Screener

DYTA vs BINC

SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

DYTA

SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF

Annual cost

1.32%

Fund size

$101M

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.8B

Key differences

Both DYTA and BINC are fixed income ETFs. DYTA charges 1.32% a year and BINC 0.40%. The main difference: BINC costs 0.92% less per year.

  • BINC costs 0.92% less per year.
  • BINC is much larger than DYTA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, DYTA has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

DYTABINC
Annual cost (TER)1.32%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$101M$16.8B
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.52%5.54%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Region
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+15.0%+5.7%
CAGR 3Y+11.8%+7.1%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.741.13
Volatility 1Y10.12%2.30%
Max drawdown-9.41%-2.69%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to DYTA and BINC