Screener
EAOA vs SUSB
iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUSB costs 0.06% less per year.
- SUSB is significantly larger than EAOA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EAOA is classified as mixed asset, while SUSB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EAOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EAOA | SUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 4.49% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.4% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.80% | 1.94% |
| Max drawdown | -25.06% | -13.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EAOA and SUSB
Explore further