Screener
EART vs AQWA
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs Global X Clean Water ETF
Key differences
- AQWA costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $26M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 14.42% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -29.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and AQWA
Explore further