Screener
EART vs RSSL
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.51% less per year.
- RSSL is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART covers global markets; RSSL covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +45.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 19.27% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -27.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and RSSL
Explore further