Screener
EASG vs EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
Key differences
- EMCS is significantly larger than EASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EASG covers global markets; EMCS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EASG | EMCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $67M | $912M |
| Since | 2018 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.96% | 1.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.1% | +50.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 21.77% |
| Max drawdown | -32.06% | -44.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EASG and EMCS
Explore further