Skip to content
Screener

EBIT vs AAUS

Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF vs Alpha Architect US Equity ETF

EBIT

Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF

Annual cost

0.29%

Fund size

$11M

AAUS

Alpha Architect US Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$526M

Key differences

Both EBIT and AAUS are equity ETFs. EBIT charges 0.29% a year and AAUS 0.15%. The main difference: EBIT follows a index tracking strategy; AAUS uses active selection.

  • EBIT follows a index tracking strategy; AAUS uses active selection.
  • AAUS costs 0.14% less per year.
  • AAUS is much larger than EBIT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

EBITAAUS
Annual cost (TER)0.29%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$11M$526M
Since20242025
Dividend yield1.78%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+29.8%N/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y17.20%
Max drawdown-26.64%-9.13%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to EBIT and AAUS