Screener
EBND vs EMTL
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF vs State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- EBND costs 0.35% less per year.
- EBND is significantly larger than EMTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EMTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EBND | EMTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $90M |
| Since | 2011 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 5.72% | 4.99% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.21 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.93% | 2.22% |
| Max drawdown | -29.50% | -22.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EBND and EMTL
Explore further