Screener
ECML vs SCHV
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
Both ECML and SCHV are equity ETFs. ECML charges 0.95% a year and SCHV 0.04%. The main difference: ECML follows a active selection strategy; SCHV uses index tracking.
- ECML follows a active selection strategy; SCHV uses index tracking.
- SCHV costs 0.91% less per year.
- SCHV is much larger than ECML. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SCHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ECML | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $131M | $15.5B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 1.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.72% | 11.05% |
| Max drawdown | -24.66% | -37.08% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.