Screener
EDGF vs IBHJ
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF
Key differences
- IBHJ costs 0.44% less per year.
- EDGF is significantly larger than IBHJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EDGF follows a active selection strategy; IBHJ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EDGF | IBHJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $506M | $133M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.45% | 6.69% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +8.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.97% | 4.09% |
| Max drawdown | -1.62% | -4.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EDGF and IBHJ
Explore further