Screener
EDGF vs MATE
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
EDGF is a fixed income ETF, while MATE is an alternative ETF. EDGF charges 0.79% a year and MATE 0.97%.
- EDGF is a fixed income fund, while MATE is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EDGF follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- EDGF costs 0.18% less per year.
- EDGF is much larger than MATE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| EDGF | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $468M | $39M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.45% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.91% | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.62% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.