Skip to content
Screener

EDGH vs MATE

3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF

EDGH

3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF

Annual cost

1.01%

Fund size

$158M

MATE

Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF

Annual cost

0.97%

Fund size

$39M

Key differences

Both EDGH and MATE are alternative ETFs. EDGH charges 1.01% a year and MATE 0.97%. The main difference: EDGH follows a multi strategy strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.

  • EDGH follows a multi strategy strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
  • EDGH is much larger than MATE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

EDGHMATE
Annual cost (TER)1.01%0.97%
Fund size (AUM)$158M$39M
Since20242025
Dividend yield1.04%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionemerging markets
Strategymulti strategytactical allocation
CAGR 1Y+24.9%N/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y17.97%
Max drawdown-10.60%-13.24%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to EDGH and MATE