Screener
EDIV vs EFAS
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EDIV costs 0.06% less per year.
- EDIV is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EDIV is classified as alternative, while EFAS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- EDIV covers emerging markets markets; EFAS covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EDIV | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $48M |
| Since | 2011 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.61% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.3% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -40.76% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EDIV and EFAS
Explore further