Screener
EDOG vs DGRE
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Key differences
- DGRE costs 0.28% less per year.
- DGRE is significantly larger than EDOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EDOG follows a index tracking strategy; DGRE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DGRE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EDOG | DGRE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $137M |
| Since | 2014 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.78% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.4% | +49.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.8% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.85% | 19.74% |
| Max drawdown | -44.29% | -36.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EDOG and DGRE
Explore further