Screener
EEM vs BREM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- BREM costs 0.22% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEM is classified as equity, while BREM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEM | BREM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28.1B | $38M |
| Since | 2003 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | — |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.54% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.82% | -4.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEM and BREM
Explore further