Screener
EEM vs EEMA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
- EEMA costs 0.23% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than EEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEM | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28.1B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2003 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.54% | 19.95% |
| Max drawdown | -39.82% | -44.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEM and EEMA
Explore further