Screener
EEMO vs PIZ
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
- EEMO costs 0.51% less per year.
- PIZ is significantly larger than EEMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMO follows a index tracking strategy; PIZ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PIZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PIZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMO | PIZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $775M |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.97% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.0% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.29% | 20.15% |
| Max drawdown | -46.57% | -40.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEMO and PIZ
Explore further