Screener
EFA vs IEFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.25% less per year.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $180.7B |
| Since | 2001 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -34.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and IEFA
Explore further