Screener
EFAA vs PGHY
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco Global ex-US High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
EFAA is an alternative ETF, while PGHY is a fixed income ETF. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and PGHY 0.35%.
- EFAA is an alternative fund, while PGHY is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EFAA follows a option income strategy; PGHY uses index tracking.
- PGHY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAA | PGHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $505M | $215M |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 8.11% | 7.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.3% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.12% | 5.07% |
| Max drawdown | -11.97% | -20.50% |
Similar to EFAA and PGHY
Explore further