Screener
EFAA vs QRMI
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
Both EFAA and QRMI are alternative ETFs. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and QRMI 0.60%. The main difference: EFAA costs 0.21% less per year.
- EFAA costs 0.21% less per year.
- EFAA is much larger than QRMI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAA | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $505M | $16M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 8.11% | 12.22% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.3% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.12% | 5.82% |
| Max drawdown | -11.97% | -20.95% |
Similar to EFAA and QRMI
Explore further