Screener
EFAA vs RLY
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
Key differences
EFAA is an alternative ETF, while RLY is a fixed income ETF. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and RLY 0.50%.
- EFAA is an alternative fund, while RLY is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EFAA follows a index tracking strategy; RLY uses active selection.
- EFAA costs 0.11% less per year.
- RLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAA | RLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $505M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 8.11% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.6% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.46% | 10.38% |
| Max drawdown | -11.97% | -34.17% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.