Screener
EFAA vs VRIG
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
EFAA is an alternative ETF, while VRIG is a fixed income ETF. EFAA charges 0.39% a year and VRIG 0.30%.
- EFAA is an alternative fund, while VRIG is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EFAA follows a option income strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- VRIG costs 0.09% less per year.
- VRIG is much larger than EFAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAA | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $505M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 8.11% | 4.80% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.3% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.12% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -11.97% | -13.04% |
Similar to EFAA and VRIG
Explore further