Screener
EFAD vs EFAS
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFAD costs 0.05% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $48M |
| Since | 2014 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and EFAS
Explore further