Screener
EFAD vs SDOG
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
Key differences
- SDOG costs 0.14% less per year.
- SDOG is significantly larger than EFAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SDOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | SDOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2014 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 3.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 11.46% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -43.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and SDOG
Explore further