Screener
EFAS vs BIDD
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs iShares International Dividend Active ETF
Key differences
- BIDD is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAS follows a index tracking strategy; BIDD uses active selection.
- BIDD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | BIDD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $438M |
| Since | 2016 | 1997 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 2.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 15.16% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -15.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and BIDD
Explore further