Screener
EFAS vs DWX
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DWX costs 0.10% less per year.
- DWX is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFAS is classified as equity, while DWX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | DWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $512M |
| Since | 2016 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 4.18% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +14.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -36.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and DWX
Explore further