Screener
EFAS vs EFAD
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF vs ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- EFAD costs 0.05% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAS | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $62M |
| Since | 2016 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.62% | 13.36% |
| Max drawdown | -44.39% | -35.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAS and EFAD
Explore further