Screener
EFAV vs EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Key differences
- EFAV costs 0.11% less per year.
- EFV is significantly larger than EFAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAV | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.4B | $30.0B |
| Since | 2011 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.8% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.37% | 14.25% |
| Max drawdown | -27.56% | -43.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAV and EFV
Explore further