Screener
EFRA vs BLDX
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF vs Impax Funds Series Trust I
Key differences
- EFRA costs 0.13% less per year.
- BLDX is significantly larger than EFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFRA follows a index tracking strategy; BLDX uses active selection.
- BLDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFRA | BLDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $114M |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.03% | — |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -8.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFRA and BLDX
Explore further