Screener
EFV vs GLOF
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.11% less per year.
- EFV is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFV | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30.0B | $196M |
| Since | 2005 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.83% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.25% | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | -43.16% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFV and GLOF
Explore further