Screener
EGLE vs SPXN
Global X S&P 500 U.S. Revenue Leaders ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 ex-Financials ETF
Key differences
- SPXN costs 0.10% less per year.
- SPXN is significantly larger than EGLE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EGLE | SPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $74M |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.8% | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.60% | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -9.78% | -32.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EGLE and SPXN
Explore further