Screener
EHCC vs XYLG
Global X Ethereum Covered Call vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- XYLG costs 0.40% less per year.
- XYLG is significantly larger than EHCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XYLG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EHCC | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.8M | $64M |
| Since | 2026 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.44% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.75% |
| Max drawdown | -11.55% | -21.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EHCC and XYLG
Explore further