Screener
EINC vs XAGG
VanEck Energy Income ETF vs Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- XAGG is significantly larger than EINC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EINC is classified as equity, while XAGG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EINC follows a index tracking strategy; XAGG uses active selection.
- XAGG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EINC | XAGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $147M | $963M |
| Since | 2012 | 1997 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 6.36% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.53% | — |
| Max drawdown | -68.85% | -2.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EINC and XAGG
Explore further