Screener
EMBD vs QRMI
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
EMBD is a fixed income ETF, while QRMI is an alternative ETF. EMBD charges 0.39% a year and QRMI 0.60%.
- EMBD is a fixed income fund, while QRMI is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EMBD follows a active selection strategy; QRMI uses option income.
- EMBD covers emerging markets; QRMI covers North America.
- EMBD costs 0.21% less per year.
- EMBD is much larger than QRMI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EMBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $16M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 12.22% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.7% | +9.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.03% | 6.00% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -20.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.