Skip to content
Screener

EMBX vs REMG

VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

EMBX

VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.76%

Fund size

$242M

REMG

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$103M

Key differences

EMBX is a fixed income ETF, while REMG is an equity ETF. EMBX charges 0.76% a year and REMG 0.64%.

  • EMBX is a fixed income fund, while REMG is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • REMG costs 0.12% less per year.
  • EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMBXREMG
Annual cost (TER)0.76%0.64%
Fund size (AUM)$242M$103M
Since20122025
Dividend yield5.33%1.08%
Asset classfixed incomeequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+11.2%+48.4%
CAGR 3Y+4.2%N/A
CAGR 5Y-2.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.12N/A
Volatility 1Y6.07%22.13%
Max drawdown-37.55%-14.13%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to EMBX and REMG