Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMC vs EMXC

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

EMC

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$61M

EMXC

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$22.1B

Key differences

  • EMXC costs 0.40% less per year.
  • EMXC is significantly larger than EMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMC follows a active selection strategy; EMXC uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMCEMXC
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$61M$22.1B
Since20102017
Dividend yield0.70%2.27%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+30.7%+65.4%
CAGR 3Y+14.8%+27.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+12.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.651.25
Volatility 1Y20.21%21.14%
Max drawdown-18.38%-42.81%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMC and EMXC