Screener
EMCB vs BREM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund vs iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- BREM costs 0.11% less per year.
- EMCB follows a active selection strategy; BREM uses index tracking.
- EMCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMCB | BREM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $38M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.37% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.47% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.81% | -4.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMCB and BREM
Explore further