Screener
EMCB vs DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
Key differences
- DGS is significantly larger than EMCB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMCB is classified as fixed income, while DGS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- EMCB follows a active selection strategy; DGS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, DGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DGS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMCB | DGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 5.37% | 3.31% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.5% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.1% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.47% | 15.41% |
| Max drawdown | -22.81% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMCB and DGS
Explore further