Screener
EMCS vs EASG
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
Key differences
- EMCS is significantly larger than EASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMCS covers emerging markets markets; EASG covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMCS | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $912M | $67M |
| Since | 2018 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 3.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.1% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.77% | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -44.86% | -32.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMCS and EASG
Explore further