Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMCS vs EEM

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

EMCS

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF

Xtrackers

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$912M

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$28.1B

Key differences

  • EMCS costs 0.57% less per year.
  • EEM is significantly larger than EMCS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMCSEEM
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.72%
Fund size (AUM)$912M$28.1B
Since20182003
Dividend yield1.44%1.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+50.1%+46.1%
CAGR 3Y+24.2%+21.9%
CAGR 5Y+7.5%+7.0%
Sharpe 3Y1.021.00
Volatility 1Y21.77%19.54%
Max drawdown-44.86%-39.82%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMCS and EEM