Screener
EMDV vs CGDG
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- CGDG costs 0.13% less per year.
- CGDG is significantly larger than EMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMDV covers emerging markets markets; CGDG covers global.
- EMDV follows a index tracking strategy; CGDG uses active selection.
- EMDV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMDV | CGDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $4.9B |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.42% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.2% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.05% | 10.69% |
| Max drawdown | -39.19% | -10.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMDV and CGDG
Explore further