Screener
EMEM vs XCNY
Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.46% less per year.
- EMEM follows a active selection strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMEM | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $9M |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -0.43% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMEM and XCNY
Explore further